Russia-Ukraine War: How many nasty prophecies have been confirmed as true?

 Russia-Ukraine War:

How many prophecies have been confirmed as true?


Some of the prophecies came out in extremely nasty ways. So much so that it was repeatedly rejected by a series of top political journals located in the USA, UK, the Netherlands, Turkey, and Norway. Unfortunately, they have been confirmed as true. Poor guys, humiliated by such nasty prophecies!

1. Ukraine may lose its country frame.

1.1 Ukraine will surely lose more territory than it had done before the war started. The bigger risk is that Ukraine may lose more territory, and even lose its country frame finally.  [2] June 18, 2022.

1.2 There is a high probability that Ukraine will split into several small pieces and become a powder keg for Europe.

2.  about main players in the war.  [2]. June 18, 2022

2.1 There are two inevitable losers, Ukraine and the EU.  [2]. June 18, 2022

2.2 Ukraine and the EU are not the main players as they had no military powers to start, continue, or stop this conflict with Russia.  [2]. June 18, 2022

2.3 The USA has been the biggest winner recently with at least 3 things: weakening Europe; weakening Russia; and creating a Ukrainian Trench to prevent Russia and Europe from approaching each other.  [2]. June 18, 2022

2.4 Russia’s economic system will not be destroyed by this war eventually because it is mainly composed of raw material suppliers.  [2]. June 18, 2022



3.  Local countries send their troops insides the war.

3.1 Ukraine must rely on economic and equipment support from USA and Europe, as well as troop support from the local countries.  [1] May 23, 2022.

3.2  If the war lasts for more than six months, there might be 3 to 7 European countries directly involving themselves in this war.  [2] June 18, 2022.

3.3  Once some local countries send their troops into Ukraine, that will result in the Somaliization of Ukraine. The worse condition is the possibility to repeat the script of Yugoslavia’s disintegration.  [1] May 23, 2022.
4.  Russia break up Ukraine.

4.1  The establishment of multiple local regimes dependent on Russia is also an important part.  [1] May 23, 2022.

4.2  Russia has to make a series of complex plans to deal with long-term pressure from the USA, including establishing about 7 autonomous local governments.  [1] May 23, 2022.


5. Europe hurt in chaos

5.1 The EU and Europe will be weakened by this war.  [1][2] May 23, 2022.

5.2  This is not a war for European long-term interests.  [2] June 18, 2022.

5.3  the Somaliization or Yugoslavization of Ukraine, would be a source of long-term instability in Europe.  [1] May 23, 2022.

5.4  Ukraine will become the birthplace of long-term unrest in the European core region.  [2] June 18, 2022.

5.5  The negative effects of a prolonged war are more in the heart of Europe than in Ukraine. The longer the war lasts, the greater the impact on the stability of European core.  [2] June 18, 2022.

5.6  Another worse and more far-reaching thing is that Europe has lost the prospect of becoming one of the world's top powers.    [2] June 18, 2022.

5.7  The biggest loss from the EU is its position as one of the top political players, and other countries no longer expect this outlook and support it.  [2] June 18, 2022.



6 about divided Europe.

6.1  Europe is divided to judge the Russia-Ukraine War. It is in the interest of the whole of Europe to set up a ceasefire line as soon as possible.  [1] May 23，2022.

6.2  For core European countries, stabilizing the situation as soon as possible is the first priority, no matter where the ceasefire line is.  [1] May 23，2022.

6.3  Some European countries fear long-term chaos in the region, but sadly, it seems that they are also incapable of responding properly.  [1] May 23，2022.

6.4  Some countries hope the war prolonged for their national interests.  [1] May 23，2022.

6.5  Russia wants to lure Europe to help stabilize ceasefire lines in this region. If the situation continues to deteriorate, Russia can also participate in or directly cause chaos in Europe.  [1] May 23，2022.

6.6  A sturdy Ukrainian Trench has been built. This ditch at least will prevent Russia from collaborating with Western Europe for the next 20 years, regardless of where the final ceasefire line is on.  [2] June 18, 2022.

  



7. about USA

The United States actually is the most powerful force in the battle of all parties. 

The overwhelming power to set up where and when the ceasefire line comes out is the United States only.


References:
 1.  Three Possible Ceasefire Lines of Russia-Ukraine War.

2. Whose War? Players winning or losing in the Russia-Ukraine War. 


  Part 2:  Some predictions yet to be confirmed or in progress.

1. Before 2026, the battle will entangled mainly in central Ukraine zone.

Ukraine War Trend Imagination
Picture from 
https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/2884201507849512240/7829636905220085272









References:
 1.  Three Possible Ceasefire Lines of Russia-Ukraine War.

2. Whose War? Players winning or losing in the Russia-Ukraine War. 


Ukraine War Trend Imagination

Picture from https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/2884201507849512240/7829636905220085272

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Three Possible Ceasefire Lines of Russia-Ukraine War:

Image
Three Possible Ceasefire Lines  of Russia-Ukraine War :  Reality Basis, Opportunity , and Prospects  (Original at May 23,2022)   Abstract:   The overwhelming power to set up where and when the ceasefire line comes out is the United States only , even though Russia, West Europe, and China also are important background factors. T here  are theoretically 3 ceasefire lines in the Russia-Ukrain e W ar. Line 1 is a geographical demarcation drawn by the Dnieper River   plus the Black Sea Coastline . Line 2 is bounded by the complete administrative boundary of the Luhansk and Donetsk regions. Line 3 is any arc in the wide area between lines 1 and 2. I f the United States only pursues a limited outcome in this Russia-Ukraine War   and  does not directly involve  other countries , the United States will ha ve  enough initiative to draw a stable ceasefire line anywhere in L1, L2, and even L3. For Russia, corresponding to the uncertainty brought by the L3 line, a ceasefire on the L1 and L2 lines w
Read more

Whose War? Players winning or losing in the Russia-Ukraine War

Image
  Abstract: T here are two certain losers, Ukraine and the EU , produced from the Russia-Ukraine War already. Europe as a whole has lost its prospect to become one of the top powers of the world. Ukraine has lost its power over its territory more than it had done before the war started. Worse yet, Ukraine might lose its construction frame as a whole country. There  i s  one certain winner and that is  Russia because it will strongly stand at its bottom line built by a complete border of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions. With this bottom line, Russia has accomplished  two main goals. The se include   the  de-Nazification of  eastern Ukraine and halting the humanitarian catastrophe in the Donbas region. Russia may win more with the best possibility to set up a blocking wall along the east bank of the Dnieper River and the Black Sea Coast. There are two other  big winners if the war is confined to a limited-scale . They are America and China. America has already reached at least three re
Read more

Conflict will remain confined to Central Ukraine until 2026

Image
Russia-Ukraine War: Conflict will remain confined to Central Ukraine until 2026   There have been three recent events with profound historical significance. One is that state terrorist attacks have been used as an applicable means of warfare[1]. Then there are Russia's statements and steps for using nuclear tools. And late NATO conducted military exercises for the application of nuclear tools [2]. These high-impact events will raise public and elite concerns about the state of the world. After the Cuban Missile Crisis, the world once again faced a serious risk of nuclear tools option. Regardless of the purpose and bottom line of the US-Russian nuclear show, the public must see that the probability of a nuclear option is real. The miniaturization of nuclear weapons yields, the increasingly weakening of the aftermath of nuclear war, and the increasing talk of nuclear options by military generals and major politicians, all of they composes of one kind of  force of nuclear option[2].
Read more